Beyond Parody

Caroline Overington today wrote on rumours that Meanjin will be going online only (She’s agreeing with Peter Craven’s view that if Meanjin goes online only it will “cease effectively to exist”):

Craven doesn’t mean that it won’t find an audience, and will sink like a stone in the swamp that is the web – although that’s very likely true – he means that publishing online is vastly inferior to publishing in a proper journal, something that can be stored in libraries, held in your hand, kept forever.

If something exists only online, it’s like a bubble blown by a child: shiny, maybe even delightful, but flimsy, soon gone…

For mine, Craven is correct: quality essays should be published on real pieces of paper. It’s disrespectful to stick them up with drivel on the Web.

Don’t look for Overington’s comments on “real pieces of paper”, though – they “exist only online.”

Words fail me.

Posted in Media | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

A good start

Quelle surprise – today brought a Twitter-baiting editorial from The Australian (link intentionally omitted):

TWITTER has become the dunny-door graffiti of the digital age, adding precisely nothing to the sum of human knowledge.

This week, as always, unattributed commentary scrolled across our screens as John Howard answered audience questions on Q & A. Supporters see it as democracy in action, but the ABC would be better off leaving viewers with a blank space than dignifiying this gratuitous feedback.

Too right: let’s stamp out unattributed commentary, and evangelise the wisdom of leaving blank space instead of letting morons scrawl on digital dunny doors. Next stop in the crusade against pseudonymous incivility should be the comment threads here.

UPDATE: One more thing: I can only assume that Sally Jackson’s weekly column on Twitter in the Australian’s Media section will be discontinued forthwith.

Posted in Media, Politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Clippings from my reading

I’ve been doing a fair bit of reading in preparation for a long essay on you know what. A couple of quotes I thought I’d share by way of a post this week.

The first is from James W. Carey’s wonderful essay. “American journalism on, before and after September 11″, in the 2002 collection Journalism after September 11. He’s describing the decline of journalism in the esteem of the American people in the latter third of the Twentieth Century. A nice evocation of a frame of mind that journalists are prevented from understanding by their professional ideology, and clearly relevant to the case at hand:

Continue reading

Posted in Media, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Desperately seeking AHNG newsletter subscription.

Pleading/lazyweb post – does anyone know where to sign up for the Australian Newspaper History Group email newsletter? All the emails I can find by Googling bounce back. I’d be most grateful if someone could let me know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Beecher vs The Drum

Just a late arvo quickie on Crikey publisher Eric Beecher’s red hot go at The Drum, which the Australian featured prominently in its media section today.

Key paragraph from Lara Sinclair’s story:

“As a huge supporter of the ABC, I have been somewhat shocked at (the ABC’s) decision to create a website (The Drum) that sits so blatantly in the territory of sites like Crikey and The Punch,” Mr Beecher said.

“Operating in the commercial space, we expect vigorous competition from other commercial publishers. But to see the ABC tanks roll up on our lawn was bewildering.”

Continue reading

Posted in Media | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Geoff Craig on political interviews.

I’ve moved a fair bit in the last few years. One of the upsides is finding out about what new colleagues are into, research-wise, and UC’s been no execption here. I got an invitation to a seminar on Monday that I’m really looking forward to by a political communication scholar in our communication department here, Geoff Craig.

Geoff’s done a lot of work on political and public communication in Australia and New Zealand (he was previously at Canterbury in Aotearoa/New Zealand; you can check out his book “The Media, Politics and Public Life” here).

Continue reading

Posted in Media, Politics, Sharing research | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Brief historical reflections on anonymity and pseudonymity

I

The arrogance journalists have lately displayed about the culture of online political discussion may be forgivable; their ignorance about their own profession and the history of publishing isn’t. In what Possum has aptly called the “faux debate” about the outing of a pseudonymous blogger, there’s been little acknowledgement of the long-standing and continuing use of anonymous and pseudonymous authors in major newspapers. Let alone the fact that anonymity and pseudonymity have been part of the fabric of a democratising public culture for more than 500 years. Bad faith, denial, obtuseness – take your pick. The fact is that leading journalists appear to have no understanding of the history of their own profession, or their business, publishing.

So, a few home truths from the history of Australian publishing. For a start, The Australian has always run, and continues to run anonymous and pseudonymous material.

Continue reading

Posted in Media, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 15 Comments

Last word on #Groggate

Last word, and for mine, the best, goes to our marsupial friend over on Margaret Simons’s thread:

There was never any “public interest” involved, it was always “journos interest”.

When you have a gallery filled with rampaging egos whose intellectual aspirations generally exceed their abilities, this sort childish rubbish is what we expect from people that live in a bubble that is as narrow in its width as it is shallow in its depth – too often confusing issues of trivial personal and industry interest with that of public importance.

Tens of thousands of words have been written about this and more will continue to be churned out – nearly universally by people that have never published anonymously in their lives, folks that have certainly never been forced by circumstance to do such a thing, and don’t have the faintest clue about why anyone would ever need or desire to do it.

It’s piss and sticks and navel lint, all wrapped up in a bunch of pretentious, self-serving twaddle – where a faux debate has been created by a bunch of miscreants that expect reality to fit into the limitations of their own life experience and the leadership of a Newspaper that thinks linkbaiting and trolling the internet is classy business model.

Meanwhile, Grog had to actually deal with the real life fallout of these self-indulgent games, committed by a bunch of infantile, ethical destitutes.

Amen to that. I won’t say any more than this outside academic papers, but make no mistake, this is a low ebb.

UPDATE:

Sorry – forgot to point to Tim Dunlop’s excellent post, too. He gets at one of my least favourite features of all this – the crocodile tears/faux concerns for Grog’s welfare from the “Australian Defence Force”, aka their media section:

Also, could they stop pretending they are concerned about Grogs’ welfare. James Massola said in another article that he hopes Grogs keeps writing. Elliot goes further:

Twitter would have been no use to Martin Luther King or to Biko without their bravery and that of their supporters. But it sure helped Jericho become a name in the Australian political and media market. He’s now even more popular, thanks to The Australian. Thankfully, he didn’t lose his job and is likely to get offers from media concerns in any case. And why not?

Massola saying he hopes Grogs keeps writing is like the guy who punched you in the face saying he hopes your broken nose gets better. Elliot’s claim that all this has been to Grogs’ benefit is just another pathetic attempt at justification. Clearly, it is not for them to judge. Besides, if they are that keen on his writing, they should’ve just hired him in the first place rather than outing him.

Posted in Media, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Grand Final reflections: News, the League and public accountability

A great Grand Final yesterday showed, once again, that Rugby League has an uncanny ability to seal up the holes punched in it and carry on, a bit like the T-1000 in James Cameron’s Terminator 2. I’ve joked before that the cockroaches we’re told will survive nuclear armageddon will probably play the game. Yesterday two (sorta) foundation clubs went at each other in the mud, and capped off a season which, as Richard Hinds suggested in the Herald the other day, was another one in which Rugby League worked hard to win back some of the community affection it lost from the mid-1990s.

Of course, the problems this year involving the Melbourne Storm came from the same people that knocked a proud code off course back then: News Ltd. You could say on the evidence of this season that League’s biggest liability is its continuing entanglement with a company that can’t, on the face of it, organise the management of a football club within the code’s rules. Conversely, it’s arguable that what’s allowed Rugby League to survive are long traditions and community associations, some of which the News-backed Super League push explicitly tried to destroy.

Continue reading

Posted in Media, Politics, Sport | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

While we wait

While we wait for the election result (more on this anon) the new interactive Arcade Fire clip is a must see. You need to have Google’s Chrome browser – then go to http://thewildernessdowntown.com and punch in your details. Revelatory. A link to my version, including my childhood home.

Posted in Media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment